|
|

|
|
Having thought through the rules
governing the aesthetics of hanging pictures, I
have come to the conclusion that most of it boils
down to people worrying about things falling on
them.
Pictures of equal size generally
work best when aligned horizontally side-by-side.
Whether they are landscape format [fig.
01] or portrait [fig.
02], they work best when side-by-side.
I think this probably stems
from the feeling of a painting as almost being a
window. When looking out a series of windows, it
feels far more natural to move sideways and see
a continuation of an outside scene than to look
up or down above or below to another window.
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The exception to this is where the space available
dictates that another solution is more logical.
For instance, if we have three small square pictures
and a door-sized piece of wall free at the end of
a corridor [fig. 03],
then a vertical stack is far more elegant as it
mirrors the space it occupies
[fig. 04].
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
So far this had been an easy task, as we have been
dealing with identical sized/shaped pictures.
It is always best to select similarsized/shaped
pictures to hang together anyway, but this is not
always possible.
In traditional picture framing, a larger gap is
always used at the foot of the image than at the
top [fig. 05]. The
reason for this is that the space adds weight to
the look of the piece and so a top heavy frame gives
the uneasy look that the picture is about to fall
on you.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|


|
|
So, hanging same-sized, same-shaped pictures is
easy, but what about when we start to mix it up
a bit?
Three simple rules apply:
1) Larger/landscape pictures always go above smaller/portrait
images.
2) Align Horizontally from the top.
3) then Vertically from the middle unless there
is single column, in which case align from a side
logically suggested by the space being occupied.
Here we have four awkward pictures to align. Do
no alighn by teh outside edges as the internal spacing
becomes sloppy looking [fig.
06].
Many people are initially tempted to select the
second one down here as looking nicer [fig.
07].
However, the human eye prefers level horizontal
lines over vertical as weÕre happier seeing a level
horizon. Although the second one down looks neat,
the internal cross balance is not as visually calming
as the two top aligned rows from the third example
below [fig. 08].
Stand farther away and look at the overall balance.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|


|
|
HereÕs an example of the background dictating usage
of space.
The door is as strong a visual element as the pictures
and so must be considered when aligning frames.
You could try and argue the casefor the middle
example [fig. 10]
by stating that the left-aligned arrangement is
contrasting and opposing the line of the door and
makes a statement.
The trouble with Ômaking statementsÕ is that they
can visually tire quickly and look like youÕre over-trying
to be clever.
In contrast, the simple elegance of the bottom
example [fig. 11]
is timeless.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Also look out for smaller objects such as light
switches, thermostat dials and clocks.
These can all throw out arrangements and set their
own lines of alignment to follow.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|



|
|
With a single landscape and a single porttait,
hang side by side or [fig.
13a], if thereÕs no space for that, hang
the landscape above and side align the portrait
below [fig. 13b].
The portrait hangs calmly from the landscape.
If we place the portrait on top, it looks dangerously
unbalanced [fig. 14a],
as if it could topple.
Similarly, centre aligning the portrait under the
landscape loos like it might visually topple [fig.
14b].
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
|
Here, although each row is aligned, overall weÕre
looking a little heavy to the left and we might
worry about the wall staying up [fig.
15].
So we hang from the top-middle, landscape above
portrait, and then move from the middle outwards
[fig. 16].
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|



|
|
At some point, most people will attempt to hang
a line of pictures up the stairs and there are various
ways people do it... most of them wrong.
A straight horizontal line proves tricky when
hanging those high up pictures and no one can see
them [fig. 17].
A vertical stack is a bit overbearing and you have
to stand craning your neck up to look at them [fig.
18].
Obviously, most people realise that a diagonal
line is the best balance. With square pictures,
it is temptingto go corner to corner. However, this
will create a 45 degree line and most stairs are
a much shallower angle than this [fig.
19].
Even worse is where people matchup corner to corner
with non-square pictures. You end up with a crazy
design that will go randomly [fig.
20].
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
|
The
aim is to find the pivotal weight of the picture (about
two thirds of the way up) and hang this line along
the same angle as the stairs. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
|
Special exceptions
At home we have a triptych of John Miller beachscapes
above the bed. Because they are coming away from
a wall at left we balance that off with a large
to small arrangement from left to right.
The rules of hanging pictures would dictate that
the pictures should be hung like the top diagram
[fig. 23].
However, in this particular case, the actual content
of the images means that this arrangement looks
odd. Because of the similarity of the images and
the strong horizon line, itÕs best in this case
to line up the horizon and let the strong visual
content set the alingment [fig.
24].
|
| |
|
|
|